It's been a while since Estase has blogged about King's Bench (AKA, the American Supreme Court). One ingredient of the imperial presidency created by Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson, and strengthened by presidents as varied as FDR and George W. Bush, is that the court of King's Bench no longer decides on what the black-letter constitution says, but engages in dishonest though creative misreadings of this original document. Furthermore, the Supreme Court has become an extension of the executive branch. Justices are picked due to their predictable ability to tow the party line of whoever appointed them. (One must concede, however, that Democratic presidents are much more adept at this than their Republican counterparts. Anthony Kennedy votes far more like a liberal than would seem appropriate for a Republican appointee. Even Sandra Day O'Connor had her embarassing Lemon case, which was also a lemon in another sense.) Long ago cast to the winds was the Political Questions Doctrine as established in Luther v. Borden . Today's Kings Bench is replete with such characters as Ruth Bader Ginsberg and "wise Latina" Sonya Sotamayor, who never saw a case of First Amendment religious freedom they thought deserved respect. It is hard to imagine any of the more conservative members standing up to the executive, never mind the peril, in the same sense that James I and Francis Bacon clashed with Edward Coke. It reminds one of W.B. Yeats' The Second Coming ,where the better people lack all conviction, and the worst are full of passionate intensity. In a world where liberals think presidents are elected kings (see movies such as The American President and With Honors), Supreme Court justices are just another way to obviate the power of House and Senate.