Cookie Consent

Friday, December 02, 2016

The Orange Blatherskite

       Citizen Kane has been elected President.  Estase has been calling the last president Oh Blah Blah for nine years.  So it behooves him to come up with a fitting moniker for Citizen Kane.  Estase formally dubs the president-elect The Orange Blatherskite.  Or O.B. for short.  Since Citizen Kane has such a fascination with all things gynecological, Estase can think of no more fitting title for him than O.B.  It also packs in a reference to all the lack of coherence that make him such a baffling pick for high office.  If liberals thought George W. Bush was hilarious, O.B. will make their sides split with laughter.  And they can relish the fact that the religious right (Requiscat in Pace) helped make a porn star First Lady!

Sunday, October 23, 2016

Conservatives Without Chests

       "Reason is and ought only to be the slave of the passions, and can never pretend to any other office than to serve and obey them."David Hume A Treatise of Human Nature, Part III, Section 3
       "The crudest sentimentalism (such as Gaius and Titius would wince at) about a flag or a country or a regiment will be of more use.  We were told it all long ago by Plato.  As the king governs by his executive, so Reason in man must rule the mere appetites by means of the 'spirited element.'  The head rules the belly through the chest--the seat, as Alanus tells us, of Magnaminity, of emotions organized by trained habit into stable sentiments.  The Chest--Magnanimity--Sentiment--these are the indispensible liason officers between cerebral man and visceral man.  It may even be said that it is by this middle element that man is man:  for by his intellect he is mere spirit and by his appetite mere animal.  The operation of The Green Book and its kind is to produce what may be called Men without Chests.  It is an outrage that they should be commonly spoken of as Intellectuals.  This gives them the chance to say that he who attacks them attacks Intelligence.  It is not so.  They are not distinguished from other men by any unusual skill in finding truth nor any virginal ardour to pursue her.  Indeed it would be strange if they were:  a persevering devotion to truth, a nice sense of intellectual honour, cannot be long maintained without the aid of a sentiment which Gaius and Titus could debunk as easily as any other.  It is not excess of thought but defect of fertile and generous emotion that marks them out.  Their heads are no bigger than the ordinary:  it is the atrophy of the chest beneath that makes them seem so." C.S. Lewis The Abolition of Man, (p.34-35)

       Watching Donald Trump talk like a social conservative is like watching a mime pretending to have a heart attack.  The portrayal is an academic exercise, disconnected from his real sentiments.
       Trump opposes Cosmopolitanism, the stoic idea that all men are brothers.  He peddles a mixture of self-interest and white nationalism.
       The secular educational system replaces conscience with conditioning.  Rather than encouraging moral behavior, it teaches adherence to the conventions of society.  (Sittlichkeit over moralitaet, you might say.)  Trump's abusive personal insults and dubious personal behavior are a fruit of demoralized American society.  This explains why his arguments against abortion seem so anemic.  Trump isn't arguing from his heart, but according to what he thinks he needs to say.
       Why would someone pretend to hold convictions when he has none?  Perhaps it is just another role;  Trump master of deals was followed by Trump, television star, which was followed by Trump University.  Next will be Trump, TV network owner!  His entire life has been a series of commercial moves.  How is this any different?
       The place of morality being the only check on nature means that lack of morality necessitates outside force to create order.  In the case of Donald Trump, he promises to be the autocrat molding America into his image.  If Trump believed in liberty, part of his message would be morality and self-regulation.
       Strength is a totem with Trump.  He clearly admires people who force their will on others.  This is another sign of Trump's deficit in benevolence and morality.  A politician within the Tao would recognize that he is, after all, only a man himself.  The fact that all men have a law written in their hearts should mean that there is no need for Strong Men.
       Donald Trump is what C.S. Lewis might have called a conservative without a chest.  He is a caricature of sorts--vulgar, selfish and crude.  There is no mediation of the emotions between his mind and the animal appetites of his belly and loins.  Thus, he knows only the self-interest of his mind married to the urges of his body.  Estase used to refer to the Clintons as mechanistic;  Bill and Hillary's politics were all about satisfying needs, with no element of the edifying or noble.  It is the opus magnum of Hillary's career that, at the crucial juncture where America could reject her and godless progressivism,  she managed to get a conservative without a chest as her opponent.

Thursday, October 20, 2016

Patriots and Gentlemen

     "I respect virtue in all its situations;  even when it is found in the unsuitable company of weakness.  I lament to see qualities, rare and valuable, squandered away without any public utility.  But when a gentleman with great visible emoluments abandons the party in which he has long acted, and tells you, it is because he proceeds upon his own judgement;  that he acts on the merits of the several measures as they arise;  and that he is obliged to follow his own conscience, and not that of others;  he gives reasons which it is impossible to controvert, and discovers a character which it is impossible to mistake.  What shall we think of him who never differed from a certain set of men until the moment they lost their power, and who never agreed with them in a single instance afterwards?  Would not such a coincidence of interest and opinion be rather fortunate?  Would it not be an extraordinary cast upon the dice, that a man's connexions should degenerate into faction, precisely at the critical moment when they lose their power, or he accepts a place? . . .In the mean time we are born only to be men.  We shall do enough if we form ourselves to be good ones.  It is therefore our business carefully to cultivate in our minds, to rear to the most perfect vigour and maturity, every sort of generous and honest feeling that belongs to our nature.  To bring the dispostions that are lovely in private life into the service and conduct of the commonwealth;  so to be patriots, as not to forget we are gentlemen."  Edmund Burke Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents (pgs. 87-88,89)

Wednesday, September 21, 2016

Flipping John Curtis' Meat

        Twenty years ago, would you have ever guessed that a product as manly as beer would be sold with gay-friendly commercials?  Bud Light apparently believes that there are more than two genders.  (Someone should tell my old English teacher.)  Heineken has an ad featuring out-of-the-closet Neil Patrick Harris where he assures you that Heineken beer allows you to "flip another man's meat."  Yes, they make it a lame double entendre by showing a guy at a grill, but everyone who's not a moron knows damn well what they mean.
         In a local politics story, our local state representative is being challenged by a Democrat named John Curtis.  Mr. Curtis' entire campaign is based on the incumbent's refusal to concede to Democratic big-spending policies so as to ensure that Conal Cochran, the Majority Leader in the General Assembly, will fully fund the local diploma mill.  The employees of said diploma mill are greatly vexed that they might lose some of the cash cow status they enjoy as state employees.  The fact that Killinois is in huge financial difficulty matters not a whit to John Curtis, whose only concern is that the contemporary equivalent of landed gentry, the government employee, remains well paid and secure.  Yesterday, Estase was reading an article from First Things that asserted that all Americans are Whigs, pointing to things like transgender rights as an example.  While it was in some ways a valuable article, Estase would assert that no, not all Americans are Whigs.  Thomas Jefferson was most certainly a Tory.  John Adams was most certainly a Whig.  The modern day Tories wish for the presidency to be an elective monarchy.  They assert that only the government cares, or should protect, the poor.  And, most germane to this discussion, they believe that a certain group is so much the center of the nation that their welfare is the preoccupation of the state.  For an eighteenth century Tory, this certain group was the landed gentry.  Their twenty-first century equivalent believes that government employees are so much the center of the nation that their welfare is the preoccupation of the state.  Just as how eighteenth century Tories looked down on businessmen and tradesmen, so do the twenty-first century Tories look down on businessmen and tradesmen.  John Curtis could care less about taxing businessmen and farmers, because what they have should be at the service of government employees, making their lives richer and more stable.  John Curtis is a modern day Tory.

Thursday, August 25, 2016

Undermined Legislatures

       "It is no inconsiderable part of wisdom, to know how much of an evil ought to be tolerated; lest, by attempting a degree of purity impracticable in degenerate times and manners, instead of cutting off the subsisting ill practices, new corruptions might be produced for the concealment and security of the old.  It were better, undoubtedly, that no influence at all could affect the mind of a Member of Parliament.  But of all modes of influence, in my opinion, a place under the Government is the least disgraceful to the man who holds it, and by far the most safe to the country.  I would not shut out that sort of influence which is open and visible, which is connected with the dignity and the service of the State, when it is not in my power to prevent the influence of contracts, of subscriptions, of direct bribery, and those innumerable methods of clandestine corruption, which are abundantly in the hands of the Court, and which will be applied as long as these means of corruption, and the disposition to be corrupted, have existence amongst us. . . .An exterior Administration, chosen for its impotency, or after it is chosen purposely rendered impotent, in order to be rendered subservient, will not be obeyed.  The laws themselves will not be respected, when those who execute them are despised:  and they will be despised, when their power is not immediate from the Crown, or natural in the kingdom.  Never were Ministers better supported in Parliament.  Parliamentary support comes and goes with office, totally regardless of the man, or the merit.  Is Government strengthened?  It grows weaker and weaker.  The popular torrent gains upon it every hour.  Let us learn from our experience.  It is not support that is wanting to Government, but reformation.  When Ministry rests upon public opinion, it is not indeed built upon a rock of adamant;  it has, however, some stability.  But when it stands upon private humour, its structure is of stubble, and its foundation is on quicksand. . . .The system of Administration is open to continual shocks and changes, upon the principles of the meanest cabal, and the most contemptible intrigue.  Nothing can be solid and permanent.  All good men at length fly with the spirit which ought to animate such men in a free state, while they decline the jurisdiction of dark cabal on their actions and their fortunes, will, for both, chearfully put themselves upon their country.  They will trust an inquisitive and distinguishing Parliament;  because it does enquire, and does distinguish.  If they act well, they know that, in such a Parliament, they will be supported against any intrigue;  if they act ill, they know that no intrigue can protect them.  This situation, however aweful, is honourable.  But in one hour, and in the self-same Assembly, without any assigned or assignable cause, to be precipitated from the highest authority to the most marked neglect, possibly into the greatest peril of life and reputation, is a situation full of danger, and destitute of honour.  It will be shunned equally by every man of prudence, and every man of spirit."--Edmund Burke, Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents, (p77,78.)

Monday, August 22, 2016

Cardinal Bernadin in Hell

       Who bears more responsibility for America's anti-natal attitude:  the Court of King's Bench who legislated from the bench, giving us abortion on demand and the politicians who defended Roe v. Wade; or does a Cardinal in the Catholic Church, who, given the option of condemning abortion or condoning the continued self-inflicted genocide, does the latter by telling Catholics they can in good conscience vote for pro-abortion candidates?  Joseph Cardinal Bernadin is the churchman in question.  His "Seamless Garment" doctrine told Catholics that they could vote for pro-abortion politicians, provided that they were doing so in furtherance of helping the poor, avoiding war, or some other putatively pro-life motive.
       If Harry Blackmon and Warren Burger are roasting in Hell for their role in abortion in America, why on Earth would we not expect God's vengeance for a churchman who keeps Catholics voting for pro-abortion politicians, even as they solidify in favor of abortion?  If Catholics had insisted on less extreme pro-abortion policies from the Democratic Party, we would not be confronted with candidates like Oh Blah Blah or H-> who have 100% ratings from NARAL.  The Catholic Church wasted its influence in American politics.  It could have made America less hostile to the unborn, but made a gelding of itself for some unknown reason.