The Primrose League is trying to disavow social conservatives again. Riehl World View has a piece about how social conservatives need to figure out which side they're on. This is a disingenuous statement; social conservatives know damn well which side they're on. Either it's Republicans or a party that is openly contemptuous of people of faith. Either it's Republicans or people who want to force Catholics to bankroll contraception. I could go on, but you get the point. The real issue is that the Primrose League knows social conservatives have no where else to go. This is the reason why they think they are an embarrassment, the country cousins whose votes they need, but whom they wish to disavow and blame for their image problems. So when an idiot like Todd Akin puts his foot in it, this gives the Primrose League a fit. They would rather run on pure economic policy, which is rather different than the attitude of Democrats. Democrats love NARAL, Planned Parenthood, and all the rest of the culture of death. When the abortion industry is embarrassed, the Democrats don't abandon them the way the Primrose League wants to jettison social conservatives. So as abominable as the Democratic Party is in what it aims to do, they at least have more loyalty to their own than Republicans show their own. Maybe Akin should step out of the way, but Republicans are almost buying into the idea the Democrats are fostering that Akin is somehow typical of social conservatives. It isn't surprising that liberals would think social conservatives are bumpkins, but it is rather disturbing when the Primrose League thinks so.