Who bears more responsibility for America's anti-natal attitude: the Court of King's Bench who legislated from the bench, giving us abortion on demand and the politicians who defended Roe v. Wade; or does a Cardinal in the Catholic Church, who, given the option of condemning abortion or condoning the continued self-inflicted genocide, does the latter by telling Catholics they can in good conscience vote for pro-abortion candidates? Joseph Cardinal Bernadin is the churchman in question. His "Seamless Garment" doctrine told Catholics that they could vote for pro-abortion politicians, provided that they were doing so in furtherance of helping the poor, avoiding war, or some other putatively pro-life motive.
If Harry Blackmon and Warren Burger are roasting in Hell for their role in abortion in America, why on Earth would we not expect God's vengeance for a churchman who keeps Catholics voting for pro-abortion politicians, even as they solidify in favor of abortion? If Catholics had insisted on less extreme pro-abortion policies from the Democratic Party, we would not be confronted with candidates like Oh Blah Blah or H-> who have 100% ratings from NARAL. The Catholic Church wasted its influence in American politics. It could have made America less hostile to the unborn, but made a gelding of itself for some unknown reason.
If Harry Blackmon and Warren Burger are roasting in Hell for their role in abortion in America, why on Earth would we not expect God's vengeance for a churchman who keeps Catholics voting for pro-abortion politicians, even as they solidify in favor of abortion? If Catholics had insisted on less extreme pro-abortion policies from the Democratic Party, we would not be confronted with candidates like Oh Blah Blah or H-> who have 100% ratings from NARAL. The Catholic Church wasted its influence in American politics. It could have made America less hostile to the unborn, but made a gelding of itself for some unknown reason.
No comments:
Post a Comment